Talk:Aguçadoura Wave Farm
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aguçadoura Wave Farm article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References needed
[edit]In November 2008 the Pelamis machines were brought back to harbor at Leixões due to a technical problem with some of the bearings for which a solution has been found. It would be good to get some verification of this statement Makerwaveguy (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Does this make sense
[edit]"The Aguçadoura Wave Farm was the world's first attempt at an experimental wave farm". While the wave farm was generally accepted as experimental it was promoted by Pelamis Wave Power as being a commercial project. I suggest leaving the word commercial in the text? Makerwaveguy (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes that seems ok to me... Feel free to change yourself, I'll keep an eye. Rehman 11:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I would suggest this is a fairer description - "The Aguçadoura Wave Farm was the world's first wave farm". This avoides the use of either "commercial or experimental" both of which could cause debate and the word "attempt" which would mean that either it was never built or it wasn't the first. (S.Portland (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Aguçadoura Wave Farm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081207035718/http://www.portugal.gov.pt:80/portal/pt/comunicacao/agenda/20080923.htm to http://www.portugal.gov.pt/portal/pt/comunicacao/agenda/20080923.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aguçadoura Wave Farm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100822021539/http://www.pelamiswave.com/project-development/local-resource-assesment to http://www.pelamiswave.com/project-development/local-resource-assesment
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)